Pirates' 20-Year Streak of Losing Seasons Started With Leyland
If I had myself a private audience
with the Pope of the Tigers, Jim Leyland, I’d pretty much just have one
question for him.
The question wouldn’t be about his
team’s bullpen, or why his catcher can’t hit, or what the deal is with that 3-9
record in extra innings. I wouldn’t ask about Nick Castellanos’ potential or
what we should expect from Bruce Rondon or why his catcher can’t hit.
The subject wouldn’t be his smoking
or whether Miguel Cabrera is the best he’s ever seen or why his catcher can’t
hit.
I’d have one question, and it would
go like this.
“What was it like when the
Pittsburgh Pirates were winners?”
Leyland ought to know. He remains
the last Pirates manager to guide the Bucs to a winning record. It happened in 1992,
before Bill Clinton was elected president—the first time.
The Pirates were three-time
defending National League East division champs after the 1992 season. The World
Series eluded them all three years, but they were a pretty decent group of
ballplayers, led by none other than Barry “Before and After” Bonds.
Leyland was a young 47 in the 1992
baseball season. His voice wasn’t as gravelly. Sports talk radio wasn’t nipping
at his heels. From 1990-92, Leyland’s baseball year would go like this: win the
division, lose in the playoffs. That was pretty much it.
In 1993, the Bucs finished below
.500, at 75-87. Pittsburgh baseball fans probably figured ’93 was a bump on the
log; a blip on the screen; a good old fashioned fluke.
It turned out to be a 20-year
bump/blip/fluke.
The Pirates became the Keystone
Kops of baseball. They were the National League’s Washington Generals.
Baseball’s version of the Los Angeles Clippers.
Leyland was fired after the 1996
season, on the heels of four straight losing seasons. His successor was none
other than Gene Lamont, Leyland’s coach on the Tigers for the past eight years.
Lamont lasted four years as Pirates manager, and he gave way to Lloyd
McClendon, who also has been on the Tigers’ coaching staff since 2006.
Cue the spooky music.
So will the Pirates only be losers
for as long as Leyland, Lamont and McClendon are together with the Tigers? Is
there some sort of curse? Because we all know that sports fans love a good
curse.
Nah.
If the Pirates are cursed, it’s
been the curse of poor drafting, questionable trades and free agent busts.
The past 20 years of losing records
have been deserved. You don’t play 162 games and call your end result an
aberration. And you especially don’t lose for two decades and blame it on
outside forces.
The Pirates have been losers since
1992 because they haven’t had very many good players. And they haven’t had very
many good players because they haven’t done a good job of beating the bushes—in
this country and elsewhere—in finding them.
The few so-called stars that the
Pirates have had since 1992 have all eventually bolted Pittsburgh for greener
pastures—which has been just about any team you care to name—or have been
traded in lopsided deals.
So it’s been 20 years of win totals
in the 60s or 70s—which is appropriate, because prior to Leyland’s arrival as
Pirates skipper in 1986, the last time the Pirates enjoyed real success was in
the 1960s and 1970s.
Pittsburgh has seen its share of
bad baseball. The Pirates teams of the 1950s were mostly dreadful. Joe
Garagiola, who played on some of those horrid Pirates teams in the fifties,
used to wile away many minutes of dead air in his broadcasting career recalling
those years, when Pittsburgh was home to the absolute worst that baseball could
offer.
Then came the resurgence in the
1960s, starting with the 1960 World Series win over the mighty New York
Yankees. The Pirates fielded pretty good teams throughout the decade, then
continued winning in the 1970s, adding two more world championships to their
total (1971 and 1979, both against Baltimore).
The well ran dry until Leyland took
over and built the Pirates into a mini-dynasty from 1990-92. Actually, it was
more of a National League East dynasty, but it was still pretty impressive.
The Pirates, in recent years, have
teased their fans into thinking that the string of losing records may be
ending.
In 2011, the Pirates were 54-49 on
July 28. They trailed the first place Milwaukee Brewers by just 1.5 games in
the NL Central (where the Bucs moved in the mid-1990s when baseball re-jiggered
itself). August was nigh and the Pirates were in the thick of things!
You heard it all back then as giddy
writers and fans had visions of the playoffs dancing in their heads. The ugly
duckling was turning into a swan and all that rot.
A 10-game losing streak ensued, and
just like that, the Pirates were the Pirates again. They were 54-59 and had
sunk to fourth place, 10 games out. They finished 72-90, which was how they usually
finished. The only difference was the 103-game tease that accompanied it.
In 2012, the Pirates did it to
their faithful again.
July 28 once again was the team’s
undoing.
In a spooky coincidence that only
the Pittsburgh Pirates could pull off, the Bucs for the second consecutive year
saw their high water mark come on July 28. For on that date in 2012, the
Pirates were 58-42 and just two games behind the first place Cincinnati Reds.
This was even better than 2011’s 54-49 on July 28.
Again Pirates fans had cause to
believe that the streak of losing seasons, which at this point stood at 19
years, was about to end. The 2012 Pirates had some players, most notably star
center fielder Andrew McCutchen, who was being mentioned in league MVP talk.
So naturally, the Pirates stumbled
and bumbled their way to a 21-41 finish (9-22 after August 29), to end up at
79-83.
The streak of losing seasons
reached an even 20.
Have you looked at the standings
lately? Pirates fans sure have, and you can forgive them for being as doubting
as Thomas.
As I write this, the Pirates are
56-38. Someone named Jason Grilli (remember him?) was just on the cover of Sports
Illustrated magazine, for his closing exploits and for his role in leading
a terrific bullpen that calls itself The Shark Tank.
July 28 is eight days away.
Something tells me that Pirates
fans will be watching the remainder of this season with one eye closed. Also
appropriate, given their logo is a pirate with an eye patch.
0 Comments:
Post a Comment
<< Home